ForestIndustries.EU
Published on ForestIndustries.EU (https://www.forestindustries.eu)

Home > Japan: Learning about REDD+


Japan: Learning about REDD+

External Reference/Copyright
Issue date: 
October 1, 2010
Publisher Name: 
Japan Finance Cooperation
Publisher-Link: 
http://www.jbic.go.jp

-----------------

http://www.jbic.go.jp/en/about/topics/2010/1007-01/index.html#01

  • What we can do for you...
  • What we can do for you...
  • What we can do for you...
  • What we can do for you...
  • FLEGT - a short reflection
  • FLEGT - what is the EU fighting indeed?

---------------

The REDD+ Seminar was held on July 27, 2010, jointly with the Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MOFA), Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT), Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries (MAFF), Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry (METI), Ministry of the Environment (MOE), JBIC, and Japan Institute for Overseas Investment (JOI).

The Seminar comprised presentations and a panel discussion on such themes as the trend of carbon market and REDD+ credit, the current state of progress and the prospect of international negotiations about REDD+, how Japan is addressing REDD+, and the methodology to measure emissions reductions.  Over 170 participants attended the Seminar, including representatives of industries and other stakeholders.

The Trend of Carbon Market and REDD+ Credit

Mr. Takashi Hongo, Head of Environment Finance Engineering Department of JBIC, made a presentation on demand-supply balance and recent price trends of Kyoto credits and expectations in the carbon market on REDD+ credits as future offset credits.

According to the World Bank Report “State and Trends of the Carbon Market 2010” released in May, the demand for Kyoto credits (2008-12) is forecast to decrease from approximately 1.6 billion tons foreseen last year to about 1.2 billion tons. The Report attributed this decrease to declining energy consumption amid global economic downturn.

In the meantime, industrial countries are obliged to achieve strict reduction targets and will need to use a huge amount of carbon offset credits for the coming years. Potential supply of credits to meet this demand up to 2020 may consist of: (1) credits from conventional individual projects such as CDM projects; (2) credits generated by a widespread use of energy-efficient products in offices and homes (demand management type); (3) credits generated through Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS); and (4) forest credits (REDD+ credits).

To make REDD+ a sustainable credit mechanism, it is desirable that private companies purchase REDD+ credits even prior to the establishment of an international institutional framework. On the other hand, we should note that a REDD+ project needs to be a sustainable business project, and therefore “what entity is responsible for its management and operation” is considered an important factor in assessing the risk and value of this credit.

REDD+ has not only values of CO2 absorption by forests but also values of biodiversity conservation through forest conservation.  While the latter values have a positive contribution to the environment, they have no direct influence on carbon credit prices from a point of view of the effects of emission reductions.  We should also take note of the difference between the positive effects of REDD+ and the values of REDD+ credits in market trading.

REDD+ Partnership and Future Prospect

Ex-Senior Negotiator for Climate Change Yoshiko Kijima, Clime Change Division, International Cooperation Bureau, MOFA, gave an account of the state of international negotiations on REDD+ and the future prospect.

Industrial countries are interested in how to achieve emission reduction targets that will be imposed on them under the post-Kyoto framework. In the case they cannot achieve their emission reduction targets through domestic efforts alone, they need to use carbon credits from other countries, and thus have high expectations for credits generated from the REDD+ program. On the other hand, developing countries take interests in financial supports provided by industrial countries for the curbing of deforestation and forest degradation. Against this background, discussions of the REDD+ mechanism were launched at the 13th Conference of the Parties to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) (COP13) held in 2007 by the industrial countries and developing countries who shared mutual interests: the former seeking the acquisition of carbon credits while the latter in need of funding.

During the COP15 to the UNFCCC in 2009, the participants agreed on the major part of the REDD+ mechanism, except the following unsolved issues: (1) Do the central governments of developing countries alone operate REDD+ projects? Or are the local governments also eligible? (2) How to measure changing emission reductions that are attributable to deforestation and forest degradation; and (3) To what extent should the indigenous peoples' rights and biodiversity conservation be taken into consideration?

To effectively address the REDD+ mechanism, it is vital, in the preparation phase, to develop a domestic institutional regime, assess the present state of forested land, and develop an environment providing underpinnings for REDD+, including capacity building of those involved in this mechanism and process. Since such efforts take a long period of time, in Oslo Climate and Forest Conference in May 2010, the interested countries agreed to establish the REDD+ Partnership to facilitate early progress on REDD+.

A total amount of US$4 billion has been pledged in support of REDD+ efforts, including approximately US$500 million by Japan and US$1 billion each by the U.S. and Norway.  Some industrial countries have already implemented pilot projects and made large-scale investments mainly to Brazil and Indonesia showing positive stance toward REDD+, with a view to putting REDD+ carbon credits on the market in the future.

Japan has an advantage in this sector, given its experience and knowhow accumulated through many years of forest assistance provided by JICA and the possession of a satellite equipped with an observation radar capable of determining the state of forests with high precision. During the COP10 to the Convention on Biological Diversity to be held in Nagoya in October 2010, the Government of Japan will organize a ministerial-level meeting on forest conservation and climate change.  We hope that there would be a significant progress on discussions of REDD+, and will take this opportunity to increase and appeal to the domestic and global community Japan's presence in the area of REDD+.

Japan's Response to REDD+ and Consideration of Methodology

Director Satoshi Akahori, Forest Carbon Sink Strategy Office, Forestry Agency, MAFF made a presentation on how Japan's efforts in REDD+ and the methodology to measure emission reductions.

A phased approach to REDD+ is under consideration.  The first phase is capacity building and developing REDD+ strategies, which should be carried out by government. The second phase is where developing countries implement their REDD+ strategies, which include demonstrative activities. This may include activities carried out by a private company on its own, and therefore you may well say that this is the phase where the private sector will gain experience.

While the participants in the COP15 to UNFCCC agreed on the guidance of REDD+ methodology, they failed to reach any consent on the REDD+ framework.

Japan's contribution to the implementation of the REDD+ program includes consideration of the methodology on forest monitoring and the prevention of illegal logging by making use of a satellite.

Hongo (JBIC):What are the latest developments in respect to the measurement and data collection of forests and carbon stocks?

Akahori (MAFF):Putting aside the question of what level of technology we should content ourselves with employing, developing countries do not measure and collect data on their forests to the same degree of precision and comprehensive coverage as Japan and other industrial countries do. For example, to measure carbon stock, it is essential to look into five carbon pools, including soil carbon, in addition to visible parts of forest such as tree trunks. In fact, industrial countries took considerable time and cost to collect and refine data on the five pools. Given the inadequate state of the basic data in many developing countries, collecting relevant data seems to be quite a time-consuming and costly task.

Hongo (JBIC):As we are talking with private companies on REDD+ credit, they have common recognized the importance of “governance.”  What are your assessments on this issue?

Kijima (MOFA):There is a need to ensure transparency and possess relevant expertise if REDD+ credits are to be included in emission credit trading. The first thing developing countries have to do is to designate a responsible government agency and then develop human resources. These countries need to put in place the conditions for it in terms of: (1) legislating relevant laws; (2) developing human resources; (3) having the capacity to educate them; and (4) dispatching them to local communities and actually spread knowledge. Also, protecting the livelihood of indigenous peoples is a difficult issue. Whether or not developing countries can formulate the plans to put in place the conditions that include these factors, whether or not they have the intention to implement them—these are the things industrial countries are watching.

Akahori (MAFF):In the process of the discussion taking shape on REDD+, developing countries have understood the importance of transparency, fairness and local community participation in terms of governance.  Although no consensus has reached regarding the text on REDD+ negotiations, the factors that should be ensured in making REDD+ operational have been set out as “Safeguard,” which includes transparency, fairness and participation of the local communities. I think one of the conditions for industrial countries to feel reassured in making investments is the fact that an institutional regime is in place for appropriately implementing the Safeguard.

Hongo (JBIC):As the REDD+ process will advance in phases, how do you think the process will evolve in the future?

Akahori (MAFF):The first phase is capacity building and developing REDD+ strategies in developing countries. It seems official funding could perform a significant role for supporting this phase. The second phase is where developing countries implement their REDD+ strategies, which include demonstrative activities.  This may include activities carried out by a private company on its own, and therefore you may well say that this is the phase where the private sector will gain experience. As I see it, the participants in the second phase will accumulate their experiences and judge whether or not they should go on to the third phase.

Kijima (MOFA):When as the result of implementing the first phase in one country, a participant has decided that REDD+ would not proceed well in that country, then it could end its involvement. On the other hand, if a participant has got the prospect of REDD+ going well after implementing the first phase, it may move on to the second phase, implementing a demonstrative project, and proceed toward implementing the full-fledged project. Industrial countries are assessing whether “it is highly likely that credits can be generated in specific countries,” and are currently putting the promising developing countries in their enclosures. Industrial countries are confronted with the alternatives of doing nothing now and bearing heavy burdens in the future and taking risks now.  It seems that in this sense, Japan is trailing behind other industrial countries, for there is no prevailing understanding here of the prospect that REDD+ credits may be used for compliance credits.

Tags

Forest carbon [1]REDD+ [2]Japan [3]


Source URL:https://www.forestindustries.eu/content/japan-learning-about-redd

Links
[1] https://www.forestindustries.eu/category/topicsthemen/forest-carbon [2] https://www.forestindustries.eu/category/forests-w%C3%A4lder/redd [3] https://www.forestindustries.eu/category/counties-laender/japan