Skip to Content

ETS - Emissions Trading Schemes (EU, NZ, ...) and Forest Carbon Credits

CO2 emissions traded to help Tohoku region

Firms that emit greenhouse gases but also want to help revitalize business in the Tohoku region following the Great East Japan Earthquake are being drawn to participate in a carbon dioxide offset trading scheme.

Named J-VER (Japan Verified Emission Reduction), the scheme is a type of carbon-offset program.

Under the scheme, entities practicing silviculture through thinning, planting and other means can enter a certification process to claim credits, depending on how much carbon dioxide their forests absorb.

External Reference/Copyright
Issue date: 
Jan. 26, 2012
Publisher Name: 
Yomiuri
Publisher-Link: 
http://www.yomiuri.co.jp/

EU carbon plunges 10 percent to record low of 6.30 euros

(Reuters) - EU carbon prices fell to their lowest ever level on Wednesday as the euro currency and equities slid on renewed fears over the bloc's debt crisis and oil prices tanked after producers promised to maintain high output.

The ICE ECX December 2011 EUA contract fell 73 cents to an all-time low of 6.30 euros, down 10.4 percent on Tuesday's 7.03-euro settlement.

External Reference/Copyright
Issue date: 
Dec 14, 2011
Publisher Name: 
Reuters
Publisher-Link: 
http://www.reuters.com

REDD+: Ready to engage private investors?

IIED code: 17112IIED
Published: Nov 2011 - IIED
External Reference/Copyright
Issue date: 
17 November 2011
Publisher Name: 
IIED
Publisher-Link: 
http://pubs.iied.org
Author: 
Isilda Nhantumbo
Author e-Mail: 
http://pubs.iied.org/search.php?a=Isilda%20Nhantumbo

Is Forest Carbon Just Another Commodity?

As already discussed on Climatico, using REDD+ as a private sector offsetting mechanism runs the risk of creating perverse incentives, exposing land to market price volatility and causing supply-induced price suppression. However, for the purposes of a deeper exploration into the market-related issues of REDD+, let’s assume these problems are solved and that forest carbon can, in theory, be commoditised and traded.

External Reference/Copyright
Issue date: 
August 23, 2011
Publisher Name: 
Climatico
Publisher-Link: 
http://www.climaticoanalysis.org
Author: 
Nick Oakes

Devil in detail of carbon farming plan

LABOR'S carbon farming initiative (CFI) has passed in the Senate but agricultural groups remain sceptical of its worth until details are made available.

Under the scheme, graziers could sell carbon credits on to businesses to offset emissions.

The scheme is designed to both reduce carbon emissions and provide graziers with an alternative stream of income.

Richmond Mayor John Wharton said he supported the scheme in principal but had reservations.

"I don't think there will be millions of dollars in it for graziers," he said.

External Reference/Copyright
Issue date: 
24 Aug, 2011
Publisher Name: 
Northwest Star
Publisher-Link: 
http://www.northweststar.com.au
Author: 
HAYLEY SORENSEN

‘Silly Fool’ Sells NZU at $20, buys back CER at $13.50 and pockets $65,000

Back in March 2011 a Carbon Monitor reader wrote to us with the quandary of what to do with his post 1989 NZU units (those with a surrender liability for loss or harvest) suggesting if he took the funds, invested in real estate then he would be ahead even with a future liability. Here is the latest update on his story.

He writes:

External Reference/Copyright
Issue date: 
August 12th, 2011
Publisher Name: 
GHG Emission Trading BLOG
Publisher-Link: 
http://ghgemissionstrading.wordpress.com

FSA warning over carbon credit trading schemes

UK Financial Services Authority (FSA) warns against unregulated schemes which risk landing you with an overpriced and unsellable white elephant...

External Reference/Copyright
Issue date: 
5 August 2011
Publisher Name: 
Guardian
Publisher-Link: 
http://www.guardian.co.uk
Author: 
Tony Levene
Author e-Mail: 
http://www.guardian.co.uk/profile/tonylevene

The Omens of Offsetting Linger on REDD

As the number of public sector financial mechanisms targeting REDD+ has increased, and consequently the volume of money flowing in to REDD+, observers are increasingly pointing out that the public sector alone cannot supply the huge sums of money needed to combat deforestation. The private sector is thus needed to share the cost and supply some of the money.

External Reference/Copyright
Issue date: 
August 05, 2011
Publisher Name: 
Climatico
Publisher-Link: 
http://www.climaticoanalysis.org
Syndicate content