Feed aggregator

In the wake of wildfires, bringing affected areas back into production poses a major challenge, particularly in remote or hard-to-reach areas. In Canada, wildfires affect an average of 2.8 million hectares of forest each year, underscoring the importance of exploring innovative solutions to support restoration efforts. Source: Timberbiz With financial support from the Quebec Ministry of Natural Resources and Forests (MRNF), FPInnovations is evaluating the potential of aerial seeding using drones as a complement to traditional reforestation methods. In the spring of 2026, field trials were conducted to test various drone systems and validate several aspects of this approach: their operational capability, the accuracy of remote sensing technologies in targeting the most suitable sites, and the germination performance of different seed capsules and seeds. The goal is to assess not only the technical feasibility of this technology but also its economic viability and the contexts in which it could offer the greatest benefits. The results of this study will help determine the role that drone seeding could play in future reforestation strategies. Conducted in collaboration with government, academic, and industry partners, this project could expand the toolkit available to forest managers and offer new options for accelerating the regeneration of fire-affected areas. The preliminary results of the study will be released in the fall of 2026.

The post Forest seeding by drone after major wildfires appeared first on Timberbiz.

Rottne has launched its new Rottne H13F – a harvester that steps into a new machine class, combining the agility of the proven H11 platform with increased capacity, higher performance, and a completely new level of operator comfort. Source: Timberbiz With the H13F, Rottne has a machine developed for operators who want more power and greater capabilities without compromising flexibility. The machine builds on the H11E platform but has been upgraded with larger 26.5-inch bogie wheels, improved stability, and significantly enhanced terrain performance. In the 8WD configuration, the machine is also extended by 250 mm, further improving stability and operator confidence in demanding terrain. “The increased working pressure of 280 bar combined with a 10.3-meter crane gives the H13F the capacity to handle larger harvesting heads such as the SP661 Lite and Log Max 6000V,” said Mathias Paulsson, Product Manager at Rottne Industri. “At the same time, a 6WD version is available for operators who prioritize maximum agility and a compact machine format. For those who prefer a larger chassis for thinning operations, the machine can also be equipped with an 11.3-meter crane combined with smaller harvesting heads.” To match the demands of the larger machine class that the Rottne H13F is now entering, tractive force has also been upgraded to a full 200 kN ensuring the right conditions even in tougher environments. With the Rottne H13F, Rottne also introduces the next step in the F-series harvester cab. The cab features extensive upgrades with a focus on ergonomics, comfort, and the working environment. New features include a new control system, a new electrical centre, updated control panels with 7-button harvester joysticks, and an electric mini steering wheel integrated into the right armrest. The interior has also received a redesigned dashboard layout with an improved sense of space and enhanced visibility. Practical features such as smart storage solutions, cup holders, and a lunchbox heater are included as standard. Climate comfort has also been improved through a more efficient climate control system and smarter airflow management. At the same time, safety has been further enhanced with stronger safety glass and larger opening rear emergency exits, improving both safety and visibility. The Rottne H13F will be the first machine in Rottne’s new F-series and marks the direction for the harvesters of the future, where productivity, power, and operator comfort go hand in hand.

The post Rottne steps up with a new harvester appeared first on Timberbiz.

In a statement Nippon Paper Industries Japan has expressed its deepest condolences to those who lost their lives in the Reiwa 8 (2026) Kumamoto Earthquake that occurred on 28 July, and its heartfelt sympathies to the bereaved families. Source: Timberbiz The company provided the following update on 29 July, regarding the impact of this earthquake on its Yatsushiro Plant (Yatsushiro City, Kumamoto Prefecture). Eleven individuals were trapped inside the plant building, and seven were rescued to date. Of the seven rescued, two are in moderate condition, and, with the deepest regret, five fatalities were confirmed. Nippon is continuing to verify the safety of the remaining four individuals. The safety of all other personnel who reported to work yesterday (including those from partner companies) has been confirmed. Operations at the Yatsushiro Plant have been suspended due to the earthquake as the company investigates the damage. Nippon Paper is assessing the impact of this incident on business performance, and an announcement will be made as soon as any matter requiring disclosure arises. To ensure the safety of affected employees, provide necessary support, and grasp the accurate status of the damage through a company-wide effort, the company established a Crisis Response Headquarters headed by Nippon Paper’s President Akira Sebe. The mill in southwest Japan is down following a magnitude 6.8 earthquake with numerous aftershocks, the main quake occurred close to the mill site. Japanese media reported eight deaths at Nippon Paper. The company’s chimney stacks partially collapsed due to the quake and fell into nearby buildings.

The post Nippon Paper caught up in Japan’s earthquake appeared first on Timberbiz.

The British Columbia Council of Forest Industries (COFI) in Canada has put together a comparison of annual harvest levels in British Columbia (BC), New Zealand, and Finland. Source: Timberbiz This analysis also provides context on differences between these three major forest jurisdictions such as forest types, ownership structures, Indigenous participation, forest management practices, wildfire impacts over a 10-year average, and the value of forest sector exports. BC is home to one of the largest forested areas in the western world, with 57 million hectares of forests, 95% of which are publicly owned. Of this total, 22 million hectares are available for sustainable timber harvesting. Finland has a total forested area of 23 million hectares with 20 million hectares available for harvesting. New Zealand has 10 million hectares of forests with 1.7 million hectares available for harvesting. Despite these differences in size, the annual harvest from New Zealand in 2023 was 31 million cubic meters, nearly matching the 35 million cubic metres harvested by BC, while Finland produced nearly double that volume, with 66 million cubic metres. This comparison suggests that notwithstanding BC’s larger forest area and strategic focus on diversifying and enhancing manufacturing of higher value forest products, other forest jurisdictions are excelling in capturing the growing demand for low-carbon and sustainably produced wood products and biomaterials. By examining key differences in ownership, forest management, and the manufacturing profiles across these jurisdictions, BC can identify opportunities to develop a more robust and competitive forest sector. The chart of the jurisdiction comparison is available here – COFI Forestry Jurisdiction Comparison August

The post Canada compares its annual harvests to Finland and New Zealand appeared first on Timberbiz.

Forest & Wood Communities Australia (FWCA) says the NSW Government’s latest Great Koala National Park announcement offers little comfort to timber workers, their families and regional communities already losing secure employment. Source: Timberbiz The Government has announced almost $1 million for councils to prepare a five-year “transition action plan” focused on nature-based tourism, small business development, job creation and retraining. The plan is not expected to be completed until mid-2027. FWCA Chair Steve Dobbyns said the announcement amounted to another plan to develop a plan while timber businesses continued to lose workers, contracts and confidence. “Timber workers do not need another planning process. They need certainty about future wood supply, their employment and the survival of the mills, contractors and small businesses that support their communities,” Mr Dobbyns said. “The industry is also still waiting for the NSW Government’s long-promised Forest Industry Action Plan or, as it increasingly appears, its Forest Industry Inaction Plan. “Redundancies began almost immediately after the Government announced its supersized koala park on Father’s Day. Workers have continued to lose their jobs, including this month, yet the Government now proposes to spend nearly another year studying impacts that were entirely predictable.” The Government describes the Great Koala National Park as a “generational economic opportunity” that will boost tourism, small businesses and employment across the Mid North Coast. However, an independent review by Professor Oswin Maurer of the University of Newcastle’s economic assessment of the park found major shortcomings in the data, assumptions and multipliers used to estimate its tourism benefits. The review concluded that the tourism projections were largely based on statements unsupported by evidence and that many of the figures used inflated the projected economic benefits. One of the most serious problems was the treatment of the number of visits to North Coast national parks as though they represented individual visitors. A single person visiting several locations can be counted multiple times, substantially exaggerating the number of tourists available to generate additional spending. “The Government cannot simply declare that changing the tenure and name of forests where koalas already live will produce a tourism boom,” Mr Dobbyns said. “Koalas, walking tracks, scenic areas and recreational opportunities already exist across these State forests and neighbouring national parks. Rebadging them does not automatically create new visitors, longer stays or higher spending.” The review also found that the original tourism analysis failed to account for “cannibalisation” where visitors attributed to the new park are simply diverted from existing attractions and destinations elsewhere in the region rather than representing genuinely new economic activity. It further noted that almost nine in 10 visits to NSW national parks were day trips, undermining assumptions that park visitors would necessarily stay overnight and generate substantial accommodation and hospitality expenditure. The review found that delivering the projected increase in tourism would require approximately 1,000 additional accommodation rooms within the first three years and around 3,500 rooms within 14 years. It estimated that between $100 million and $150 million would be required for additional accommodation in the early years, rising to between $250 million and $350 million over the longer term – not including the cost of upgrading existing rooms or developing the additional tourism experiences and infrastructure needed to attract higher-spending visitors. The review found that the original study did not explain where this substantial private investment would come from or whether it was likely to materialise. “The Government is talking about a tourism-led transition without identifying who will invest the hundreds of millions of dollars needed to deliver it,” Mr Dobbyns said. “A $995,300 grant to prepare another plan does not build thousands of hotel rooms, create premium tourism experiences or guarantee that visitors will come.” The review also identified fundamental labour-market problems with relying on tourism as a replacement industry, including low pay, part-time and seasonal employment, irregular working hours and persistent difficulty attracting workers. “Nobody should celebrate permanent, skilled and well-paid forestry and manufacturing jobs being replaced with lower-paid, insecure or seasonal tourism employment,” Mr Dobbyns said. “That is not economic diversification. It is a government-sanctioned pay cut for workers and families who have built their lives around a renewable, productive industry.” The review found that the forests proposed for the original park concept supplied approximately 60% of the North Coast’s hardwood timber harvest and warned that removing such a large share of supply would have serious consequences for downstream businesses, competitiveness and consumer prices. The Government’s latest announcement still does not explain how remaining mills will obtain secure long-term wood supply or how the timber previously produced from the forests will be replaced. “Closing sustainable production forests does not eliminate the demand for timber. It transfers production interstate or overseas,” Mr Dobbyns said. “That means greater reliance on imports, increased exposure to international supply disruptions and the export of environmental impacts to jurisdictions with weaker regulatory standards. “The NSW Government must stop announcing plans to write plans and provide certainty on future wood supply, viable employment and the promised Forest Industry Action Plan. “Until then, this is not a credible transition strategy. It is a transition away from secure employment, regional manufacturing and sovereign timber-producing capacity, based on tourism benefits that the Government has still not demonstrated.”

The post More plans with dubious figures for Great Koala park fails forestry workers appeared first on Timberbiz.

The maths does not add up: forest carbon method risks millions of low-integrity credits. Forestry Australia is raising serious concerns about the new Improved Native Forest Management in Multiple-use Public Native Forests Method (INFM Method), after technical analysis by its forest carbon experts identified material flaws that could systematically, and significantly, overstate carbon abatement. Source: Timberbiz Analysis by Forestry Australia’s forest carbon experts indicates the INFM Method could potentially over-credit projects by 40% to 100%, even before the full effects of leakage and carbon stored in harvested wood products are taken into account. Forestry Australia President Dr Michelle Freeman said the findings raise serious concerns about whether credits issued under the INFM Method would represent genuine climate benefit. “There are fundamental problems with this Method. Its prescribed accounting and modelling framework is structurally biased towards issuing more carbon credits than the genuine climate benefit achieved,” Dr Freeman said. “Forestry Australia supports credible investment in forest carbon and does not dispute that avoiding native forest harvesting can generate genuine abatement in some circumstances. But every ACCU issued must represent a real, additional and accurately measured tonne of emissions reduction. “That is why the maths must add up.” Forestry Australia’s assessment identifies three central problems: The 15-year accounting period is too short: This is significantly shorter than the periods commonly used in forest carbon accounting; for example, the Plantation Forestry Method uses a 100-year accounting period. While harvesting causes an initial loss of forest carbon, regrowth captures carbon over many decades. Ending the accounting after 15 years excludes much of this regrowth, making the baseline appear to store less carbon and inflating the estimated carbon benefit of the Method. The accounting structure over-credits projects upfront and relies on future deductions: The INFM Method over-credits projects up front. Later reporting periods then deduct some of the earlier credits as regrowth occurs to claw back some of what was over-credited. The appearance of continuing carbon benefit therefore depends on repeatedly adding new areas; if that flow slows or stops, the underlying shortfall becomes visible. FullCAM is applied incorrectly: The Method prescribes clearfall harvesting assumptions to be implemented in FullCAM, Australian Government’s tool for estimating greenhouse gas emissions and carbon stored in forests and land. Given the vast majority of native forest harvesting in Australia is implemented as selective or partial harvest, the INFM Method adopts an approach that does not reflect on-ground outcomes and is inconsistent with the settings used in Australia’s National Greenhouse Gas Inventory. This misapplication of the model in FullCAM exaggerates the difference between the project and baseline forests and inflates the estimated carbon benefit.   Forestry Australia’s testing indicates that correcting the short accounting-window issue alone could reduce estimated abatement by more than 40%. Correcting the FullCAM modelling could reduce estimated abatement by more than 50%. “These are not marginal differences arising from professional judgement. They are material and cumulative problems embedded in the Method’s prescribed calculations,” Dr Freeman said. Millions of ACCUs could be issued without a genuine carbon benefit. The consequences could be significant because ACCUs generated under the Method may be used to offset real greenhouse gas emissions elsewhere in the economy. “If the Method overstates the carbon benefits achieved, emissions offset through the purchase of ACCUs will not be balanced by an equivalent climate benefit. That weakens confidence in the ACCU Scheme, makes it harder for Australia to genuinely meet its emissions-reduction targets and means the Safeguard Mechanism will not work as intended,” Dr Freeman said. New South Wales has promoted that it could generate approximately 22 million ACCUs over 15 years by ending timber harvesting in relevant public native forests. If the Method overstates abatement by around half, approximately 11 million ACCUs could be issued beyond the genuine carbon benefit achieved. Forestry Australia raised its concerns more than 12 months ago and repeatedly requested representative FullCAM files, modelling assumptions and sufficient technical detail to independently reproduce and test the claimed abatement outcomes. These materials have not been publicly released by the proponent, and material changes introduced by the proponent after consultation were not exposed to further independent testing. “A method with the potential to materially affect Australia’s carbon market should be transparent, reproducible and scientifically defensible. This is what is expected of a high-integrity ACCU Scheme method, yet the INFM Method has not met this bar,” Dr Freeman said. Forestry Australia has also identified broader integrity risks relating to leakage, additionality and double counting. The Method caps indirect leakage at 40% even where an independent assessment might find a higher rate. Furthermore, it does not provide sufficient safeguards to objectively demonstrate that harvesting reductions would not have occurred anyway. In addition, it creates a risk that state governments could generate and sell ACCUs while also counting the same emissions reductions towards their own reporting and targets. “In raising these concerns, Forestry Australia is seeking to safeguard the ACCU Scheme, not undermine it. The fastest way to damage confidence in a carbon market is to issue more abatement than is really there and try to resolve the problem later. It is far better to address it openly now,” Dr Freeman said. Based on the evidence currently available, Forestry Australia considers that the INFM Method should not be relied upon for ACCU issuance until its accounting and modelling problems have been resolved. Forestry Australia remains ready to provide technical expertise to government and supports the development of credible carbon methods that reward genuine improvements in forest management, health and resilience across all forest types and land tenures. Download the Forestry Australia Briefing Note: Forestry Australia’s analysis of Improved Native Forest Management Method (INFM Method)

The post The maths does not add up for the forest carbon method appeared first on Timberbiz.

Evidence presented to the Parliamentary Inquiry into Victoria’s 2026 bushfires has exposed serious failures in Labor’s bushfire preparedness and response. The Nationals and Liberals have tabled a Minority Report, refusing to accept the Environment and Planning Committee’s Report which papers over the deep structural flaws and policy failures of the government. Source: Timberbiz The Nationals’ Member for Eastern Victoria and Committee member, Melina Bath said the Majority Report overlooks the experiences of affected communities and frontline responders and fails to reflect the full weight of evidence. “Witness testimony and submissions paint a damning picture of Labor’s Victoria’s bushfire preparedness,” Ms Bath said. “The Inquiry heard evidence of fuel management failures, declining emergency service capability, leadership shortages, ageing equipment and growing bushfire risk. “These findings lay bare the consequences of years of Labor’s poor policy decisions, inadequate preparedness and its failure to act on repeated warnings. “Labor’s restructure of emergency services, funding decisions and workforce shortages have weakened the CFA’s capability and reduced frontline preparedness. “One of the most alarming revelations was the CFA’s original response to questions on notice was sanitised by the Government and Cabinet before being resubmitted.” Ms Bath, who is also Shadow Minister for Public Land Management said Labor has neglected critical bushfire mitigation, failing to undertake adequate fuel reduction, roadside vegetation management and the creation of strategic fuel breaks. “Years of Labor’s failures have resulted in hazardous fuel loads across the state and an elevated bushfire risk. “Our Minority Report calls for more fuel reduction, better roadside management and strategic fuel breaks to protect communities, critical infrastructure and firefighters. “It provides practical recommendations to strengthen CFA capability, improve emergency management and enhance protection for regional communities. “Labor was repeatedly warned about bushfire risks, yet communities, volunteers and first responders were left to bear the consequences.” The Nationals Member for Lowan, Emma Kealy, said the two reports confirmed what locals had been warning about for years. “Fuel loads are being mismanaged, volunteers are still forced to ride in tankers with no rear cabin protection, and trucks and tankers are suffering mechanical failures because they are well beyond their service life,” she said. “My community has lived through the consequences of the Labor government’s failures year after year, and we simply cannot afford another fire season where our hard-working CFA crews don’t have the necessary resources and support to protect us. “Only an elected Nationals and Liberals Government will scrap the Emergency Services Tax and properly fund the CFA, effectively manage our firefighting fleet, and back our selfless volunteers who put their lives on the line.”

The post The serious failures in Victoria’s bushfire response tabled appeared first on Timberbiz.

A former president of NSW Forest Products Association now Timber NSW Lexie Hurford passed away this week aged 86 after a short illness. Mrs Hurford had been presented with an award for more than 45 years of dedicated and outstanding service to the forest industry. Source: Timberbiz “She is a legend of our industry,” Maree McCaskill, chief executive of Timber NSW, said. Ms McCaskill said Mrs Hurford had made an outstanding contribution to the development of forestry policy, environmental management, and sustainable resource governance in Australia over a distinguished career spanning more than 60 years. “Throughout her adult life, Lexie Hurford has been recognised as one of Australia’s most influential forestry policy advocates, combining practical industry experience, and strategic public policy expertise to advance the sustainable management of Australia’s forests and natural resources. “In addition to this, Lexie has remained grounded in the Northern Rivers community with a particular interest in investment attraction and job creation for the region and an understated role as an advocate and leader of women’s roles in business.” Her work had been instrumental in shaping contemporary approaches to forest management, balancing environmental stewardship, biodiversity conservation, community expectations, and the economic needs of regional Australia. Through senior leadership positions across government, industry and advisory organisations, she had consistently advocated for evidence-based policy development and long-term stewardship of Australia’s forest estate. As the first woman elected as Chairperson of the NSW Forest Products Association in 1999, Mrs Hurford broke new ground in the Australian forestry sector, providing visionary leadership to the state’s peak timber industry body while championing sustainable forest management, regional employment, industry innovation and greater participation of women in forestry. “Lexie has played a key role in the development and implementation of forestry strategies that have influenced both state and national policy settings. Her expertise has been sought by governments, industry bodies, research organisations, and community stakeholders, reflecting the respect she has earned across a diverse range of sectors,” Ms McCaskill said. A passionate advocate for sustainable forestry, Mrs Hurford worked to strengthen the relationship between environmental outcomes and productive land management and was a strong supporter of scientific research, innovation and best-practice forest management, helping to ensure that Australia’s forestry sector remains internationally respected for its environmental standards and sustainability credentials. She served as Chair of the Regional Development Board from 1995 to 2003, providing strategic leadership during a period of significant economic and community change in regional NSW. Through her stewardship, the Board worked to strengthen regional industries, support employment growth, and promote sustainable economic development across rural communities. Beyond her direct policy contributions, Mrs Hurford dedicated significant effort to mentoring emerging professionals within the forestry and natural resource sectors. Her leadership has helped foster a new generation of forestry practitioners, scientists and policymakers committed to sustainable resource management. The significance of the Hurford family’s contribution to regional industry and investment was recognised by senior New South Wales government leaders, including Premier Bob Carr during his term of office from 1995 to 2005 Ms McCaskill said that Mrs Hurford’s career had been characterised by integrity, professionalism and a commitment to public service. Her work contributed substantially to the protection and sustainable management of Australia’s forests while supporting employment, economic development and community resilience in regional Australia. “Lexie’s influence can be seen in the evolution of modern forestry policy frameworks, improved environmental management practices, stronger industry-government partnerships, and the promotion of sustainable forest management principles across Australia<‘ she said. “Her contribution has had lasting national significance and continues to benefit both present and future generations of Australians.”

The post Vale: Lexie Hurford an outstanding leader in forestry appeared first on Timberbiz.

The ABC has reported that more than 80 people are to lose their jobs at Opal’s Maryvale Mill in Gippsland. The company blamed the Victorian Government for the changes to its operations due to the failure of the government to secure timber for Opal’s production lines. Source: Timberbiz Opal has previously cut jobs at the mill and experienced a number of shutdowns. The mill permanently shut down its white paper manufacturing operations, including the decommissioning of Paper Machine 2 and Paper Machine 5. This structural shutdown was triggered by the sudden end of VicForests’ native timber supply, resulting in 200 job losses and shifting the mill’s focus strictly to packaging and brown paper. According to the ABC the company is now blaming the state government for this latest decision to axe another 84 jobs. “The end of white paper production has significantly changed the operational footprint of the mill, and the site has been working to right-size its operations as a kraft and recycled paper manufacturer,” the company said in a statement. “This has included ongoing fixed cost reductions to align with its reduced footprint.” The ABC reported that Opal said it was to make cuts across salaried team members and team members covered by enterprise agreements. In a statement, the company said it suffered “substantial losses due to the Victorian Government’s failure to meet its contractual obligations under the Wood Pulp Agreement”. This latest cut follows years of disputes at the facility. In the first months of 2025 Opal locked out more than 300 CFMEU production workers with only one hour’s notice. The company initiated the 30-day, unpaid lockout after seven workers staged a short, protected stop-work action during Enterprise Bargaining Agreement (EBA) negotiations. The dispute ended on February 16, 2025, when workers voted to accept a new agreement with wage increases. In February 2024 members of the Australian Manufacturing Workers’ Union (AMWU) were locked out of the site early in the morning following a breakdown in maintenance EBA negotiations over member quotas. In June 2020 Australian Paper (before rebranding to Opal) locked out more than 100 workers for three weeks. Management used the lockout to complete maintenance after employees took protected strike action during a long-running industrial dispute.

The post Maryvale mill to cut another 84 jobs, Vic govt to blame appeared first on Timberbiz.

John Lawrence raises an important question about how Tasmania measures the full value of its public production forests. That discussion should consider not only accounting treatments and hypothetical land costs, but also the broader economic, environmental and community benefits delivered through the responsible management of our forests. The claim that Sustainable Timber Tasmania’s published financial profit is merely a “paper profit” overlooks the figures designed to show how the underlying business is actually performing. In 2024-2025, STT recorded a $7.5m increase in the value of its biological assets. It also separately reported an underlying net profit of $0.8m, defined as operating revenue less operating expenditure and positive operating cash flow of $1.8m. It paid an ordinary dividend to the state and has now recorded eight consecutive profitable results. Since 2017, STT has paid $30m to the state in dividends and made contributions to on-island processing funds to help the local sawmilling sector modernise its equipment. Importantly, STT’s accounts are prepared under Australian Accounting Standards, including the standard applying to biological assets. The forest valuation is undertaken by an independent specialist and examined by Audit Tasmania, which concluded that the 2024–2025 accounts presented a true and fair view of STT’s financial performance, position and cash flows. STT is happy to acknowledge that such accounting standards do not capture every social and environmental value provided by Tasmania’s forests and it is reasonable to debate the limitations of the accounting process. However, STT is not using a valuation method of its own invention. We are applying the accounting rules required for biological assets, which measure the value of the standing timber, which are not designed to measure every economic, environmental and community benefit. That distinction is important because valuing the standing timber separately does not mean the broader costs of managing the forest are ignored. STT’s financial statements include contractor and freight costs, property management, local government rates, road depreciation, forest re-establishment, and fire prevention and suppression. For example, whilst reporting a financial profit last financial year, STT also carried out maintenance on 3040km of existing roads, constructed 24km of new roads, conducted works on 5566ha of forest, sowed 100 million locally sourced seeds and achieved a 99.5 per cent regeneration success rate across the areas assessed. STT also planted about half a million seedlings in restocking timber plantations that had been previously harvested. The characterisation of STT as having “rent-free” access is similarly incomplete. STT is not a private company handed free land to exploit. It is a government business enterprise established under legislation to manage Permanent Timber Production Zone land for multiple users, while supporting economic growth and employment and supplying agreed volumes of timber. It manages a forest-road network of more than 10,000km, providing access for communities, tourism, beekeepers, hunters, fishers, emergency services and other land managers. It also manages hundreds of leases, licences and easements, supports apiary sites, undertakes conservation, research programs, biodiversity outcomes, carbon storage and provides a trained statewide firefighting capability with about 16 per cent of PTPZ, around 129,000ha, being managed purely for conservation. The $12m STT receives from government is transparently identified as payment for community service obligations: keeping public production land managed and accessible, undertaking fuel-reduction work, supporting fire prevention and detection, and helping suppress fires on non-production forests and adjoining land. That is not a concealed subsidy to log sales. It is payment for public services the state would still need to allocate should timber harvesting end. The wider economic contribution of STT’s forestry activities also matters. During 2024–2025, STT paid $109m to 544 Tasmanian businesses, with 87 per cent of its purchases made locally. About $45m went to harvesting and haulage contractors. More than 1.2 million tonnes of forest products were harvested and transported for Tasmanian processing, including high-quality eucalypt sawlogs and special-species timbers. Those figures represent regional Tasmanian businesses – including contractors, truck drivers, sawmill workers, engineers, mechanics, furniture makers, builders and small businesses. Most importantly, value creation does not stop when a log leaves the forest, that is only the beginning. Once delivered, the value of the log and the number of people employed continues to grow as it moves through local processing, manufacturing, construction, retail spending, wages and household incomes. None of this means native forestry should be beyond scrutiny. STT must keep improving efficiency, transparency, forest practices and environmental outcomes. It must account for carbon, biodiversity, cultural values, water, recreation and future generations, while meeting supply commitments and maintaining financial discipline. The evidence suggests Tasmania is not carrying a cost burden from public production forestry. Through employment, processing, public land management, fire protection, regional investment, community access and dividend returns to the state, Tasmania is receiving substantial value from its forest industry. Dean Kearney is the chief executive of Sustainable Timber Tasmania

The post Opinion: Dean Kearney – how Tasmania should measure the full value of its forests appeared first on Timberbiz.